'Life chemicals'

'Life chemicals' may have formed around far-flung star

By Jason Palmer
Science and technology reporter, BBC News

Meteorites tend to contain an excess of left-handed amino acids

There is now even more evidence that life on Earth may have been seeded by material from asteroids or comets.

Prior research has shown how amino acids - the building blocks of life - could form elsewhere in the cosmos.

These molecules can form in two versions, but life on Earth exclusively uses just one of them.

Now an Astrophysical Journal Letters paper shows how conditions around a far-flung star could favour the formation of one type over another.

Amino acids are corkscrew-shaped molecules that can form twisted to the left or right, and chemistry does not inherently favour one corkscrew direction over another. But without exception, life on Earth makes use of the left-handed version.

A famous experiment in 1952 showed how a spark across a soup of simple chemicals representing the primordial Earth could form amino acids - but like many that followed, it formed equal numbers of left- and right-handed types.

The idea that amino acids might have been delivered to the early Earth by meteorites - themselves formed from asteroids or comets - provided another route, and studies of meteorites have even shown excesses of left-handed amino acids.

Last week, Nasa astrobiologist Daniel Glavin and his colleagues followed up on that finding, saying their research showed that a wide variety of meteor types might play host to excesses of this sort.

What remained was to determine the mechanism by which the left-handed version could be preferentially produced in the cosmos, to be picked up and ultimately delivered to Earth.

Circular argument

Now, Uwe Meierhenrich of University of Nice Sophia Antipolis and colleagues have found one way that this "symmetry breaking" may happen.

They started with chunks of icy material that included several simple molecules: water, methanol, and ammonia - ingredients from which amino acids can be made.

They then exposed the ices to ultraviolet light of a very particular type.

Start Quote

Did life just randomly choose one type over another? It's starting to look like Nature helped a bit”

Daniel Glavin
Astrobiologist, Nasa Goddard

Light has a polarisation, which is to say that light rays oscillate along a given direction - say, up and down, or left and right. While we can't see this effect directly, it is apparent in polarising sunglasses, which block reflected light that tends to be polarised along the left-and-right direction.

The light used by the researchers, by contrast, was what is known as circularly polarised. Rather than along a single direction, the polarisation traces out a corkscrew shape.

Light in the regions around a forming star is known to become circularly polarised like this as it passes through vast clouds of dust grains that are aligned by magnetic fields.

The experiments showed that the circularly polarised light led to the formation of both left- and right-handed amino acids - but there were slightly over a percent more of the left-handed version.

That is the level of excess that Dr Glavin and his colleagues have found in meteorites found on Earth - and the mechanism is a compelling fact in the case for an extraterrestrial origin for Earth's first amino acids.

"This excess is pretty cool," Dr Glavin told BBC News.

"You've got to break the symmetry somehow, this is critical. But how do you break it? That's one of the most important questions: did life just randomly choose one type over another? It's starting to look like Nature helped a bit."

However, Dr Glavin noted that these molecules can swap their forms, and that an unequal mixture of the two types will settle out to an equal mixture in time, a process called racemisation.

"These are exactly the kinds of experiments we need to be doing but we do need to keep the big picture in mind," he said.

That is, he said, to further shore up the idea that life on Earth started with a delivery of extraterrestrial ingredients, it still remains to pin down the mechanism by which the unequal mixtures can be preserved for the long journey from far-flung stars.

Save the bees: 1 million by Friday

lets go.................

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Alex Wilks -- Avaaz.org" <avaaz@avaaz.org>
Date: January 18, 2011 6:16:28 PM GMT-04:00
Subject: Save the bees: 1 million by Friday

Petition exploding, almost 1 million -- delivery to key international meeting on Friday. Forward to friends!

Dear friends,

Bees are dying off worldwide and our entire food chain is in peril. Scientists blame toxic pesticides and four European governments have already banned them. If we get the US and the EU to join the ban, other governments across the world could follow, and save bees from extinction. Sign the petition and forward this urgent appeal:
Silently, billions of bees are dying off and our entire food chain is in danger. Bees don't just make honey, they are a giant, humble workforce, pollinating 90% of the plants we grow.

Multiple scientific studies blame one group of toxic pesticides for their rapid demise, and bee populations are recovering in countries where these products have been banned. But powerful chemical companies are lobbying hard to keep selling these poisons. Our best chance to save bees now is to push the US and EU to join the ban -- their action is critical and will have a ripple effect on the rest of the world.

We have no time to lose -- the debate is raging about what to do. This is not just about saving bees, this is about survival. Let’s build a giant global buzz calling for the EU and US to outlaw these killer chemicals and save our bees and our food. Sign the emergency petition now, and send it on to everyone and we’ll deliver it to key decision makers:

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/save_the_bees/?vl

Bees are vital to life on earth -- every year pollinating plants and crops with an estimated $40bn value, over one third of the food supply in many countries. Without immediate action to save bees many of our favourite fruits, vegetables, and nuts could vanish from our shelves.

Recent years have seen a steep and disturbing global decline in bee populations -- some bee species are already extinct and last week we learned that some US species are at just 4% of their previous numbers. Scientists have been scrambling for answers. Some studies claim the decline may be due to a combination of factors including disease, habitat loss and toxic chemicals. But increasingly independent research has produced strong evidence blaming neonicotinoid pesticides. France, Italy, Slovenia and even Germany, where the main manufacturer Bayer is based, have banned one of these bee killers. But, Bayer continues to export its poison across the world

This issue is now coming to the boil as major new studies have confirmed the scale of this problem. If we can get European and US decision-makers to take action, others will follow. It won’t be easy. A leaked document shows that the US Environmental Protection Agency knew about the pesticide’s dangers, but ignored them. The document says Bayer’s "highly toxic" product is a "major risk concern to non target insects [honey bees]".

We need to make our voices heard to counter Bayer’s very strong influence on policy makers and scientists in both the US and the EU where they fund the studies and sit on policy bodies. The real experts -- the beekeepers and farmers -- want these deadly pesticides prohibited until and unless we have solid, independent studies that show they are safe. Let's support them now. Sign the petition below, then forward this email:

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/save_the_bees/?vl

We can no longer leave our delicate food chain in the hands of research run by the chemical companies and the regulators that are in their pockets. Banning this pesticide will move us closer to a world safe for ourselves and the other species we care about and depend on.

With hope,

Alex, Alice, Iain, David and all at Avaaz

MORE INFORMATION

Bee decline could be down to chemical cocktail interfering with brains
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jun/22/chemicals-bees-decline-major-study?INTCMP=SRCH

Bee briefing
http://www.soilassociation.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=RXLEm9WXrHk%3D&tabid=439

$15 Billion Bee Murder Mystery Deepens
http://www.businessinsider.com/colony-collapse-disorder-still-unsolved-lead-researcher-had-connections-to-bayer-2010-10

“Nicotine Bees" Population Restored With Neonicotinoids Ban
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/05/nicotine-bees-population-restored-with-neonicotinoids-ban.php

EPA memo reveals concern that pesticide causes bee deaths
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/green/detail?entry_id=79910

Beekeepers want government to pull pesticide
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/beekeepers-want-government-to-pull-pesticide-1107701.html

Bees in freefall as study shows sharp US decline
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jan/03/bumblebees-study-us-decline?INTCMP=SRCH

Pesticide industry involvement in EU risk assessment puts survival of bees at stake
http://www.corporateeurope.org/agribusiness/news/2010/11/16/pesticide-industry-future-bees

Vanishing of Bees provide details on the EPA leaked documents

--------------


Support the Avaaz community! We're entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations. Our dedicated team ensures even the smallest contributions go a long way -- donate here.



Avaaz.org is a 6.5-million-person global campaign network
that works to ensure that the views and values of the world's people shape global decision-making. ("Avaaz" means "voice" or "song" in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 13 countries on 4 continents and operates in 14 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz's biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

This message was sent to jwright@surfbvi.com. To change your email address, language, or other information, contact us via this form -- or simply click here to unsubscribe.

To contact Avaaz, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at www.avaaz.org/en/contact or call us at +1-888-922-8229 (US).

‘Star Trek’ Future From Verizon

No iPhone, but ‘Star Trek’ Future From Verizon


Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Ivan Seidenberg, the chairman and chief executive of Verizon, on Thursday.

LAS VEGAS — Those expecting Ivan Seidenberg, the chairman and chief executive of Verizon Communications, to pull out a gleaming iPhone from his pocket during the opening keynote of the Consumer Electronics Show can stop holding their breath.

Mr. Seidenberg did not introduce a new version on Apple’s flagship smartphone compatible with the company’s wireless network. And although Sanjay Jha, the chief executive of Motorola Mobility, sat on stage with Verizon for a portion of the speech, no new Verizon devices were introduced other than what was shown during Motorola’s press event the previous night.

Rather, he sketched out details of the rapidly expanding smartphone industry and skyrocketing data demands of consumers, subtly nodding towards the company’s position against its rivals.

“The network experience not only changes what we can do but what you can do,” he said.

Analysts say that in the coming months, as popular smartphones like the iPhone begin to migrate to other carriers, wireless carriers will have to rely on pushing their network as a key way to lure new subscribers and retain the ones they have.

Verizon’s early roll-out of its fourth-generation wireless network, said Chetan Sharma, an independent wireless analyst, “gives them a lot of bragging rights.”

“They will continue to hammer that in 2011,” he added.

Lowell McAdams, the chief operating officer of Verizon Wireless, also drummed home the networks advantages, noting “all 4G is not created equal.”

Verizon’s 4G network “is a game-changer because it speeds up the innovation cycle meaning consumers will benefit much sooner than anyone expects,” he added.

Jeff Bewkes, chief executive of Time Warner, also appeared on stage to talk about collaborating with Verizon, describing the emergence of streaming television on mobile devices “a second golden era of television.” Mr. Bewkes appearance helped underscore the notion that C.E.S. is increasingly becoming a media summit for entertainment companies as well as electronics companies.

“It is an explosion of vitality that is moving from the TV screen to every other screen that you have,” he said.

Mr. Seidenberg talked about the future of capabilities coming from Verizon Wireless, saying the network’s move to a faster network would enable advancements in health care technology, smarter homes and networked cities.

“The sheer scale of connection of this new world will be truly mind-boggling,” Mr. Seidenberg said.

Before closing out the session, he advised attendees that when thinking about the future of Verizon Wireless to “think Star Trek.”

A Physicist Opts-Out

Boxing Day Special: A Physicist Opts-Out

Recommend

185
By
DEC 26 2010, 1:15 PM ET
OK, back to business. A physics professor from a college in the East replies to this item, in which a software engineer explained why new "enhanced" backscatter-radiation TSA machines can't be assumed to be safe. The physics professor writes:
>>There is no such thing as a risk-free dose of ionizing radiation. The federal government studied this using beagles right after World War II and found no safe dosage level. And for good reason.

The reason Albert Einstein won the Nobel Prize was for explaining the photoelectric effect, not for relativity. His explanation involved the discovery that light is absorbed and emitted in discrete energy packets called photons, like a stream of particle. Photons are only absorbed or emitted one at a time, and their energy depends on their frequency.

We learn two things relevant to current news from this: 
   1. All microwave photons are far too weak to cause damage to molecules through their absorption. The energy level of a microwave photon is sufficient to cause a molecule to rotate or vibrate (this is how microwave ovens work) but not to cause it to disintegrate or modify its structure, and those are essential requirements for causing a DNA molecule to mutate into a malignant strand. Epidemiology cannot answer this question because its methods are not aware of physical laws. They can place a statistical limit on mutagenicity, but physics actually rules it out as physically impossible. Lesson? Cell phones do not cause cancer. Period.

  2. On the other hand, X-rays cause molecular damage very easily because they are extremely energetic. In fact, this is the reason why they permit you to see inside things. Anything further up the spectrum than the near-UV is capable of causing cancer. But UV is not energetic enough to penetrate. It is absorbed in the outer layers of the skin, and so can cause skin cancer but not, say, lung cancer. X-rays penetrate. They cause cancer everywhere. And dosage is cumulative over your entire lifetime. Every time you have an X-ray, you slightly increase your chances of contracting cancer. This is why the radiologist always goes into another (shielded) room and puts a lead blanket over parts of you that they aren't interested in. Now each additional dose is a small risk increase, to be sure, and the benefits of medical treatment are generally worth the risk (though I am frequently irritated by the tendency of dentists to X-ray my head with wild abandon). 

So I will not go into the naked scanner under any circumstances. It is only for PR purposes, and I don't give a shit about helping Obama or Pistole or anyone else primp their public image. Millimeter wave is safe, X-ray is not, but you never know which one you're getting. TSA workers should be up in arms since they're standing around the machines unshielded all day long. This will eventually come back to bite the government. 

You can take that from a physicist.

Oh, and by the way, being afraid of irradiated breast milk is idiotic. That radiation is not entering your body and so can't damage it. On the other hand, so long as the TSA has a policy [of treating breast milk as a "medical fluid'] , they need to honor it.<<
And, from another reader, a report on his first enhanced pat-down:
>>Very exciting; I was selected and opted out. It was pretty thorough; the guy kept telling me "I've reached a sensitive area, I will now use the back of my hand." Lo and behold they found nothing. Although they were very interested in my belt loops and pant cuffs. The guy was talkative and noticing a scar on my elbow (which I got hiking with enough pack weight I barely noticed it, but it is quite prevalent now) tried to talk about that--it was clear he didn't want to be doing this but had found a way to cope. Rather professional--I was somewhat impressed. I think that, in the future, I'll forgo the radiation again.<<
That's my plan too, when the time comes.